Feeder cattle grazing under oil palms.

I have been one of the most enthusiastic supporters of breeding cattle in palm plantations since I first saw this type of operation in Malaysia in the 1980’s. A number of Indonesian palm plantation companies have conducted trials over recent years with mostly positive results in terms of production but with marginal financial returns. In order to breed cattle in numbers large enough to provide a useful impact on self-sufficiency in Indonesia, the returns need to be very attractive and unfortunately, while they are generally positive, I don’t believe profit margins are high enough to encourage large scale adoption of the breeders under palm model.

Photo1_Breeders under palms

Photo : Breeders under palms can do well with good management but the profit margins are simply not high enough to attract a large number of big investors.

Recent changes in beef processing throughout rural Indonesia now make it possible to consider a new palm grazing model that has the potential for high levels of productivity and profitability.

Firstly, while the national cattle herd is static or possibly even slowly expanding, the number of slaughter males available for normal wet market beef supplies is shrinking as a result of the rapid increase in the numbers of bulls (there are no steers in Indonesia) slaughtered for the annual Qurban religious festival. Official government figures for 2019 show that over the 3 day Qurban festival last August, 541,171 bulls were slaughtered across Indonesia. Given reporting difficulties in some areas this could easily be well below the real figure. Hence the number of male slaughter cattle available for normal domestic market supplies for the rest of the year is seriously reduced placing upward pressure on prices. The law prohibiting the slaughter of breeding females is strictly enforced. This supply gap is partially being filled by imported Australian cattle which are fattened in local feedlots then slaughtered in ESCAS approved abattoirs (Export Supply Chain Assurance System – the Australian animal welfare monitoring system) which have been established far and wide across Java, Sumatera and Kalimantan. Imported Australian cattle are now able to be slaughtered under ESCAS requirements in locations never before considered as commercial. The management of feeders grazing in the plantation needs to have ESCAS compliance but this should not be difficult to manage as animals are seen every day as they move to a fresh grazing area allowing for accurate traceability as well as a high standard of welfare and husbandry. Fattening Australian feeder steers in palm plantations in remote areas of Sumatera and Kalimantan has suddenly become a feasible option.

The key parameters that suggest that grazing steers is potentially profitable include :-

  • Average daily gains (ADG) of 330 grams per head per day are known to be easily achieved by cows and growers grazing under palms so in 3 days a steer should be able to gain 1 kg (or more).
  • The total cost per head per day including all inputs for breeding cows is about Rp10,000 so it might cost up to 3 x 10k = Rp30,000 to gain 1 kg of live weight. Operational costs for steers will certainly be less.
  • Switching from breeders to steers means that mating, abortions, calving difficulties, cow infertility, calf mortality, heifer segregation, mis-mothering, weaning, bulls fertility, pregnancy testing, etc. etc. all disappear from the management package. Average mortality rates of steers grazing pasture will always be much lower than that of breeders.
  • For slaughter animals, the value per kg live weight in Kalimantan and Sumatera where virtually all the palm plantations are located is around Rp45,000 (Rp50,000 in some areas) which means that there appears to be a profit margin of around Rp5,000 per head per day
  • Feeder steers arrive in Indonesia at an average of about 320 kg. After growing for 1 year at 330 gm per day they will have gained about 120 kg so they will then be about 440kg live weight.
  • If the net profit is Rp5,000 per day then the annual profit per head is Rp1.825 million or AUD$198 (AUD$1 = Rp9,200).
  • If an easily manageable group of 250 steers can be grazed together then the annual net return for the unit should be about Rp456 million (AUD$49,500).
  • With the average plantation size about 5,000 hectares and a conservative stocking rate of one steer for 5 hectares this means that an average plantation might be able to graze up to 4 groups of 250 head with an annual net return of close to AUD$200,000.
  • Marketing should not present a great challenge as animals can be sold throughout the year, as required in small truck lots into hungry local markets. A 1,000 head steer grazing operation would need to sell an average of less than 3 head per day.
  • From conception to sale of a grown progeny can take close to 3 years for a breeder project while purchase of a feeder to sale of a fat steer will be nearer to 12 months or less.
Photo2_Growers grazing under palm

Photo : Growers grazing under palm. Minimal management with scope to speed up performance by increasing cost effective supplementation.

Photo3

Photo : this is yesterday’s cell after a single day of grazing. Woody weeds will be spot sprayed in the next few days. These trees are about 5 years old. The cattle will cycle back to this cell in about 70-90 days time.

Photo4_Feeders grazing

Photo : Feeders grazing the next cell the day after the photo above. This mixed group of male and female yearling progeny from imported Australian cows are growing at 600 grams per head per day with a modest level of daily supplement.

If an imported feeder steer grows at 500 grams per day then in 2 days it gains 1kg or a value of Rp45,000. Deduct costs of 2 x Rp10,000 leaving a profit margin of Rp25,000 in 2 days. Rp12,500 per day or AUD $1.35 per day x 365 = AUD$492 per year or $123,000 per year for a single 250 head grazing group. Now we’re talking. But remember this level of performance will only be possible in a very well managed plantation with well established grazing conditions. This quantity and quality of grass is usually only possible to develop after 2 or 3 years of effective cell grazing and spot spraying of woody weeds.

One of the main concerns of plantation owners grazing cattle is that their stock would be at risk of theft as they would be out in the plantation overnight where thieves would have the opportunity to steal them. Data collected over the last 3 years in projects where breeders grazed under palms in remote areas of Sumatera and Kalimantan demonstrate that while this certainly is a possible risk factor, the actual experience in the field shows that this risk is an extremely small and acceptable one. The costs of effective levels of security are included in the Rp10k per day total cost for breeders.

Admittedly this model doesn’t solve the breeding shortages in Indonesia and still requires imports but it does provide additional fresh beef supplies with local value adding in remote areas and has potential to cut the costs of herbicides for palm plantations. While small holders won’t be directly involved in the management of the cattle, it is possible to include them in the project by operating a nucleus-plasma model where local small holder groups could be financed into ownership of a proportion of the stock while the plantation company manages the grazing operation and shares the profit. The welfare challenges for steers are insignificant compared to those of breeders.

As the demand for bulls purchased specifically for the Qurban religious festival rises along with the income levels of Indonesian citizens, the numbers of locally bred slaughter bulls available for normal daily supplies of fresh beef will continue to shrink. This palm feeder steer option has the potential so solve many if not all of the Indonesian government’s fresh beef supply problems in its more remote areas with a model that is profitable, where small holders can share in those profits and where animal welfare and security risks are minimised. In the first instance, while the plantation companies unfamiliar with cattle management figure out how best to conduct operations, an opportunity exists for Australian producers and exporters to provide support, training and potentially commercial participation in the business. Northern Australian cattle producers have a life-time of experience grazing cattle in remote areas and may well enjoy seeing feeder cattle facing up to fresh green feed every day of the year.

 

 

9 thoughts on “Feeder cattle grazing under oil palms.

    • Dear Dr Azid, you might notice one of the photos is of your very nice red cow group. I think this grazing model has a useful commercial role even if it is combined with breeders. Best regards. Ross

      Like

  1. Ross,

    Thanks for this. My question is, how would they manage leakage? I see that as the greatest threat, being able to demonstrate that cattle were not heading off to some abattoir that is not ESCAS approved. In a feedlot there is a high level of surety through paperwork and so forth but out in the paddock? Or how easy would it to be to slip a few out and say they died in the paddock? We would just have one of these and hell would descend on our heads.

    Having said that and I agree breeding is a specialised job that even we have difficulty with, the cattle look good and it could be a boon to send them over to ‘Happy Pastures” before slaughter, rather than ‘Happy concrete pens”. As a well managed marketing message to the rest of Australia.

    Regards

    Helen Armstrong Gilnockie Station

    Like

    • Dear Helen, there is little difference in the capacity to audit cattle in the feedlot or the paddock as in this case cattle are moved from cell to cell every day and are very accurately counted as they walk slowly to the next paddock. Very simple for any auditor to count the real number, just like in a feedlot pen. regards
      Ross

      Like

      • Dear Dr Ross, thanks for the clear description on how we manage and count our cattle when they are moved from grazing ‘paddock’ to the next one on rotation. We are commencing a pilot project to use RFID tag to improve our monitoring system.

        Like

  2. Hi Dr Ross. How are you? Thanks for the report on cattle-oil palm integration. It’s good to note that uder oilpalm the Australian Brahman could put on about 600 gm/day with modest level of supplement, What are the supplements being used? Are there any integration of local cattle, Bali perhaps, with plantation? if there are how do they fare? How do the plantations manage weaning of calves?

    Thank yo Dr Ross

    Regards

    Omar

    Like

    • Dear Omar, the supplements are about 2-3 kg of palm kernel cake and a mix of mineral salts and vitamins with the cost per day between AUD20-30 cents per head per day. Any cattle can integrate under palms including Bali and local breeds but their genetics is selected for high fertility and slow growth so it is not possible to get the same growth rates out of them. Weaners constantly escape back to their mother unless they are retained in a secure cattle yard for about 3 weeks. Weaners and their mothers cannot be separated by electric fencing or even barbed wire in many cases so only a strong cattle yard will do the job properly. This also gives the manager a good chance to feed the new weaner a good ration to ensure it is growing well after separation so nothing lost. Once this separation is complete then they are safe to return to grazing and will have forgotten about their mum by then. regards. Ross

      Like

  3. Pingback: New post Feeder cattle grazing under oil palms. ⋆ NT Buffalo Industry Council

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s